Building Effective ETL Pipelines: Lessons from the Field
Why ETL Pipelines Fail
After years of building and maintaining ETL pipelines, patterns emerge. Pipelines fail for predictable reasons:
Key Design Decisions
Batch vs. Streaming
Batch works when data freshness requirements are measured in hours or days. Simpler to implement, easier to debug, lower infrastructure costs.
Streaming is necessary when freshness is measured in minutes or seconds. More complex, requires different skill sets, but enables real-time use cases.
Most organizations need both. Start with batch, add streaming for specific use cases.
Full vs. Incremental
Full loads are simpler and self-healing. If something goes wrong, the next run fixes it. But they do not scale—loading a billion-row table nightly is expensive.
Incremental loads are efficient but require careful design. How do you identify changed records? How do you handle deletes? What happens when incremental logic fails?
Idempotency
Can you run the pipeline twice and get the same result? Idempotent pipelines are easier to operate. When something fails, you can simply re-run without manual cleanup.
Quality Checks
Build quality checks into every stage:
Source validation
Transform validation
Load validation
Monitoring and Alerting
Pipelines need observability:
Conclusion
Reliable ETL pipelines are built, not born. They require thoughtful design decisions, quality checks at every stage, and robust monitoring. The investment pays off in data you can trust and operations that do not wake you up at night.